Evaluating the effectiveness of an academic literacy course: Do students benefit?

Jean Parkinson, Leonora Jackson, Tamlin Kirkwood, Vasanthie Padayachee


The proliferation of academic literacy courses in South African universities in the last 25 years prompts the question of how effective such courses are. Addressing the difficulties of studying in a second language combined with insufficient stress on reading and writing at school, such courses are designed to assist students with university reading and writing tasks. This article describes how reading and writing acquisition are scaffolded in one such course designed specifically for students who enter a science degree programme through alternative access routes. It then assesses how successful the course is at improving students’ academic reading and writing. Equivalent tests before and after the course indicate that students do improve their academic reading and writing, with the weakest students making the biggest improvement. By the end of the course the academic literacy of this weakest group is, however, still not equivalent to that of regular entrants to the Faculty. Student evaluation at the end of the course indicates that students believe they have learnt much from the course and, to a lesser extent, that they have enjoyed the course. Previous students report making extensive use of the literacies taught by the course in the later years of their degrees.

Full Text:


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5785/24-1-37


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c)

ISSN 2224-0012 (online); ISSN 0259-2312 (print)

Powered by OJS and hosted by since 2011.



This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.

SUNJournals Help