The refinement of a test of academic literacy
AbstractTo ensure fairness, test designers and developers strive to make their instruments for assessing the language abilities of learners as accurate and reliable as possible, and have traditionally used a number of techniques to ensure this. From a post-modern, and especially critical perspective, however, these measures are not enough to ensure fairness. In these approaches, fairness is redefined and reconceptualised. This article demonstrates that it is still possible to use conventional techniques to achieve the goal of, for example, increasing the accessibility of a test. Using several statistical analyses of the results of a test of academic literacy as examples, the article concludes that traditional, quantitative measures enhance and complement, rather than undermine, current concerns.
All articles are published under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license; copyright is retained by the authors. Readers may download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the author(s), but they cannot change the articles in any way or use them commercially.
Published articles are openly accessible online and therefore reprints are not provided.